By Owen Barder 
Posted by Owen Barder on Nov 1 2011. Filed under Aid & Development. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
This joint post with David Roodman first appeared on the Guardian Poverty Matters blog . Does Britain?s remarkable political consensus supporting foreign� aid �obscure a more ambiguous overall footprint in the developing world?Though by no means unanimous, Britain?s cross-party agreement to protect the aid programme from budget cuts is admirable. It reflects an understanding that it is ultimately in the national interest to support development, as well as being the right thing to do
More:
How committed are we to development?
Related posts:
- Connected, aware and committed to change
- Health Programme Development Adviser | Save the Children UK
- What?s Hot and What?s Not in Global Development for 2011
- Is there too much emphasis on the donors? national interest in?
- (Britain?s) Conservative Party gives up party political broadcast to?
Posted by Owen Barder on Nov 1 2011. Filed under Aid & Development. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry 
Source: http://www.globalhealthhub.org/2011/11/01/how-committed-are-we-to-development/
healthmaster 1200 watt health bracelet health product health care
No comments:
Post a Comment