Monday, August 1, 2011

Health Highlights: July 28, 2011

Here are some of the latest health and medical news developments, compiled by the editors of HealthDay:

New Brain Scan Technique Reveals Back Pain Severity

A new brain imaging technique may help doctors determine and monitor the severity of patients' low back pain, researchers say.

They found that the method, called arterial spin labeling and performed during MRI scans, enabled them to observe changes in blood flow in specific areas of the brain as chronic back pain patients held uncomfortable positions, ABC News reported.

The study was conducted by scientists at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and appears online and in the August print issue of the journal Anesthesiology.

"Normally, when you do studies with older techniques, you're not able to track the changes in people's chronic pain over time," study co-leader Dr. Ajay D. Wasan, an assistant professor of anesthesiology and psychiatry, told ABC News. "This provides a way to look at the physiology of the brain when someone has more or less chronic pain."

-----

Judge Dismisses Suit Barring Embryonic Stem Cell Research

The Obama administration will be able to continue funding embryonic stem cell research after a lawsuit challenging it was dismissed Wednesday.

The lawsuit alleged that a federal law that prohibits taxpayer financing of embryonic stem cell research that harms an embryo was being violated by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. But the Obama administration argued that federal policy allows research using embryos that were harvested long ago through private funding, the Associated Press reported.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ruled last year that the lawsuit was likely to succeed and ordered a stop to federally-funded embryonic research while the case continued. But the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. ruled that the lawsuit was likely to fail and overturned the injunction.

As a result, Lamberth released an opinion Wednesday in favor of the Obama administration, the AP reported.

Scientists hope that embryonic stem cells will one day provide cures for a number of ailments, including spinal cord injuries and Parkinson's disease.

-----

Little Evidence of 9/11 Cancer Link: Report

A U.S. government report released Tuesday says there isn't enough evidence at the moment to determine whether dust and smoke caused by the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center caused cancer in rescue or recovery workers or New York City residents who lived near the site.

The finding means that people with cancer diagnoses they attribute to the 9/11 attack don't qualify for federal benefits to treat or compensate them for their disease, says The New York Times.

The report by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health was required by a new federal act that provides $4.3 billion over the next five years to monitor, treat and compensate people who were exposed to dust and fumes from the WTC attack.

The report is based on a review of available evidence, but there have been only 18 published research studies on the WTC attack that mentioned cancer. Only five of those studies were peer-reviewed and they yielded mixed findings, according to NIOSH Director Dr. John Howard, The Times reported.

A second review of a possible link between cancer and the WTC attack will be conducted in early to mid-2012, Howard said.

According to The Times, some physicians believe a link to cancer will emerge with time.

Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, head of a program devoted to 9/11 treatment, monitoring and research at Mount Sinai Medical Center, told the newspaper that the likelihood of malignancies tied to 9/11 increases as years go by. He pointed to his team's research into multiple myeloma, which seems to be occurring at a higher-than-usual rate and at an unusually young age in some responders.

-----

MedicalNewsCopyright � 2011 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/guide.asp?s=rss&k=DailyHealth&a=147537

men\\\'s health concerns men\\\'s health forum men\\\'s health magazine subscription healthy foundations

Nursing in the New Era of Accountability

By John Glaser and Gail Latimer July 28, 2011

As the health care system begins a multifaceted transformation, nurses will make important contributions to our collective success.

Every day, America's nurses bring compassion, leadership, skill and vision to our health care system. They take care of the sick, comfort the dying and serve as the glue that holds the patient experience together.

They also are leading the prevention-focused, quality-oriented paradigm shift associated with the most sweeping changes to the U.S. health care system in more than 40 years.

Indeed, the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ushers in an era of broad health insurance coverage and the first wave of substantial health care payment reform. The private sector also has unleashed a complementary wave of changes in provider reimbursement approaches.

While these payment reform efforts are diverse, they share several characteristics:

  • Providers will be asked to measure and report the quality, safety and efficiency of care delivered.
  • A significant portion of reimbursement will be based on these measures; providers will face material financial risk if their care is deemed to be substandard.
  • Reimbursement is evolving to include episodes and bundles. Payment will be based on the holistic care of a patient, be it a single payment for hip replacement surgery and rehabilitation care, or a single payment for care delivered to a diabetic over the course of a year.
  • Regardless of care performance, reimbursements will decrease.
  • Greater transparency of provider quality scores and costs will be required, enabling purchasers of care and consumers to make more informed choices as they seek care.
  • Efforts will be made to compare the effectiveness of new programs and treatments with that of current programs and treatments; those that fail to demonstrate quality outcomes will not be reimbursed.
  • Provider organizations will be made accountable for the care of patient populations, with these providers establishing such new arrangements as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes.

HITECH Requirements

For providers to achieve the level of care that will become the new standard, they must employ a solid foundation of health information technology. It is not possible to achieve the necessary levels of quality performance, conform to evidence-based medicine or manage increasingly complex reimbursement arrangements without such a foundation.

The federal government understood the need for this foundation when it passed the HITECH Act in 2009, which provides financial incentives for hospitals and eligible professionals that demonstrate they are meaningful users of electronic health records. In effect, the government, as the largest purchaser of health care in the world, was saying clinicians must use the technology to enter orders, document care and exchange data with other providers if they are to address effectively the changes introduced by the PPACA.

As providers embark on their journeys to comply with the requirements of HITECH, savvy nurse executives see this as a time for their profession to shine. They understand that nursing will play a key role in determining their organization's success in this era of accountable care.

Nursing at Center Stage

Nurses are at the center of efforts to coordinate patient care. They ensure that care delivery is delivered efficiently, that the care team is informed of the status of a patient and that transitions of care are managed effectively.

Moreover, nurses generate the majority of the documentation that makes up a patient's medical record. These data will be a source for measuring compliance with the law's quality reporting requirements, helping an organization qualify for federal incentive monies or avoid penalties. In fact, many organizations have found themselves in good standing for the meaningful use quality reporting requirements largely because of the data nurses already are capturing electronically in clinical practice.

Of particular importance to the nursing community is avoiding CMS's "never events," a set of hospital-acquired conditions the agency has deemed preventable and thus not reimbursable. Technological tools alert clinicians so they can prevent never events from occurring. Using technology to support clinicians in day-to-day care delivery can make a measurable impact on the outcome of care.

Regardless of where an organization lies along the technology adoption curve, there is reasonable certainty about the major health information system applications our nation's nurses will encounter in the era ahead:

  • an integrated electronic health record that spans inpatient, outpatient and emergency department care;
  • a revenue cycle system that also spans this care continuum and is well integrated with the electronic health record;
  • workflow engines that help to improve the performance of core clinical processes, e.g., patient discharge, chronic-disease management and infection management;
  • rules engines that critique a specific clinician decision, e.g., drug-drug interaction checking after the entry of a medication order;
  • business intelligence and analytics technologies that enable providers to measure the quality, safety and efficiency of their care, monitor clinical performance, and understand the resulting reimbursement ramifications;
  • interoperability technologies that enable providers to exchange such clinical data as patient allergies, problems, medications and information on events (e.g., an unplanned emergency room visit) with other providers as they jointly manage the care of the patient;
  • patient-oriented technologies like the personal health record and online patient communities that assist patients in managing their own care.

The Road Ahead

Benefiting from these health care IT investments is as much a function of leadership as it is the right technology and strategic partner. There is no better time for nurses to exert their leadership and become intimately familiar with their respective organization's strategic IT vision, especially the implications it will have on the patient care environment.

A successful nurse executive who has anticipated new technologies is positioning his or her organization to thrive in the era ahead by doing the following:

Secure a seat on the organization's IT advisory board or steering committee. Make it a priority to evaluate the IT roadmap and contribute to decisions about which applications will be rolled out and how those tools will integrate into clinical practice. Assist in completing gap analyses with regard to meeting meaningful use criteria and prioritizing projects.

Seek out opportunities to become an executive champion. Some of the most successful IT initiatives spring from an alignment between the CIO and executive champions like the CNO and CMO. Each group remembers to "walk in each other's shoes," influencing the project's key stakeholders and bringing their concerns and recommendations to the project leaders.

Foster interdisciplinary collaboration. Be the ambassador who breaks down the typical organizational silos ? dietary, laboratory, occupational therapy ? that exist in most health care facilities. Help others embrace a shared leadership model that fosters interdisciplinary collaboration throughout the IT implementation.

Be open to the voice of front-line nurses. Bedside nurses are keenly aware of the challenges associated with handoffs of information and care transitions. Provide ample opportunity for nurses to give input into the design of the system.

Create a sense of nursing ownership. Assuming front-line staff have venues for providing input, be sure that when requested changes are made, nurses see them firsthand. Creating this type of feedback loop is empowering for end users.

Contribute to a communication plan that follows the implementation progress. Doing so will help ensure that all stakeholders understand the organization's strategic objectives and each discipline's role in bringing them to fruition. Share implementation highlights so that team members are aware of progress.

Establish a set of guiding principles for end users as they adopt new technologies. Perhaps these will support the culture change the technology is expected to drive; perhaps they outline how the IT staff will work with and solicit feedback from the nursing staff, for example.

Continuously assess readiness for change and adoption. Survey clinicians and understand that lower response scores will come from those who realize the new applications are affecting their workflow. Help staff members move from skepticism to hopeful realism, informed optimism and, eventually, satisfaction with the new technology and processes.

Show other nurses the way by sharing best practices. As technology continues to make it easier to implement evidence-based practice and protocols, take advantage of the many opportunities the industry offers for sharing successes and learning from others.

Don't underestimate the power of technology in nurse recruitment efforts. There isn't a nurse joining the profession who wouldn't want to use a bar-coding solution to help ensure the safety of the patient during medication administration.

Providing Consistency Amid the Chaos

It is difficult to be certain about the impact of the PPACA on the nation's health care system in the decade ahead. There are dozens of new approaches to payment, and their effectiveness at a national scale or across all populations is unclear. Moreover, it is not possible to attempt to transform the largest and most complex sector of any economy and have a complete understanding of the mature forms of the new health care system. We are in for a decade of experimentation, chaos and uncertainty.

Through the challenging years ahead, the nursing community must remain the backbone of care delivery. The community must be active, thoughtful and vigorous contributors to reshaping the health care system. They also must be skilled and effective in their application of information technology to improve care. To a large degree, the future of health care depends on nursing and its sophisticated use of information technology.

John Glaser, Ph.D., is the CEO of Siemens Health Services in Malvern, Pa. He is also a regular contributor to H&HN Daily. Gail E. Latimer, M.S.N., R.N., F.A.C.H.E., F.A.A.N.,�is the vice president and chief nursing officer of Siemens Health Services.

The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the policy of Health Forum Inc. or the American Hospital Association.

in general. All comments will be reviewed by a moderator before being posted.

Please note: Your browser cookies must be enabled to leave comments and remember your login information. If you are having trouble posting a comment please enable your browser cookies or email us your comment at hhndaily@healthforum.com.

Source: http://www.hhnmag.com/hhnmag/HHNDaily/HHNDailyDisplay.dhtml?id=5990002017

bally total fitness planet fitness lifetime fitness health hoop

Better Alternatives to Silver Fillings

BY: Dr. Lorin Berland

Traditional silver fillings were first used in France in 1826. That was a long time ago, and silver fillings are not really even silver: They are actually mostly made of mercury, mixed with some silver, tin and copper too. This high mercury content has created concern for the health safety of silver fillings, and several countries have even banned their use.

Fortunately, the alternatives to these old-fashioned amalgams contain no toxic metals -- and they look better too. They also help preserve and conserve your teeth, and as a result, strengthen them. Here, we compare the top two alternatives so you know what to go for:

Composite Fillings
Composite is a tooth-colored, plastic-like material made to withstand the force put on teeth. Composite fillings look a lot like teeth.

The Good: Because they bond to teeth, they?re durable. And even though they?re more expensive than silver fillings, insurance usually covers most of the cost.

The Bad: Composites are more difficult to place than silver fillings and usually take longer to put in. Also, if you?re looking to replace your silver fillings with them, it may be difficult and may not last: Because silver fillings use bulk for strength, big holes will be left in your teeth after taking them out, which will make it hard for composites to bond on them.

The Bottom Line: Composites are an affordable, sturdy choice for first-time fillings.

Inlays and Onlays
An inlay is shaped to fit the cavity and cemented into place. First, an impression of your tooth is taken, and the inlay -- or onlay, which covers the cusp of your tooth -- is created in gold or tooth-colored polymer ceramic. Then, it fits like a puzzle piece over your tooth, putting it back together in its original shape again.

The Good: The tooth-colored inlays or onlays are hardened with light, pressure and heat -- a triple advantage that tends to make them more durable than composites, which are hardened only with light. Bonding seals them in to better protect the tooth from future decay.

The Bad: They are much more expensive than composite or amalgam fillings, and insurance usually covers part of the expense. In addition, they often require two office visits about two weeks apart. (In the interim, you?ll be fitted with a temporary.) Some dentists, however, have their own laboratory and can do it all in one visit.

The Bottom Line: They work very well in cases where the tooth fracture is substantial, or if you are replacing large amalgam fillings (that includes your old silver fillings). If you don?t have great dental hygiene habits and can afford it, an inlay might even be a good choice for large first-time fillings.

Source: http://www.oralcareandhealthdaily.com/blog/silver_fillings_alternatives/index.html

health cigarette health hula hoop healthy white health matters

Health Tip: When Sleep Apnea Affects Children

Source: http://www.medicinenet.com/guide.asp?s=rss&k=DailyHealth&a=147556

exercises for sciatica exercise ball exercises for a flat stomach exercise tv

Americans unimpressed, but glad to see debt deal

(AP)�

LOS ANGELES - Americans seem relieved that the wrangling over the debt limit is over. But for the deal itself ? not so much.

People around the country had a range of reactions to the agreement hammered out Sunday by the president and top lawmakers, but mild disappointment with an occasional touch of sympathy were about as positive as they got.

"It should have happened a real long time ago," said Phil Waters of Anchorage, Alaska, reflecting a common response.

President Obama: Deal reached on debt crisis
Debt deal likely to put hurt on states, poor
Boehner trumpets GOP influence in debt debate

"It never should have gotten this far out of hand," Waters, a 60-year-old semiretired helicopter mechanic, said from inside a downtown Anchorage bar.

The self-described "almost Libertarian conservative" said he would have liked to see a lot more cuts than the spending reductions President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner agreed to.

But Kiran Mahto of Portland, Ore., who volunteered for the Obama campaign in 2008, would have preferred no deal at all to the concessions he feels the president made to congressional Republicans.

Mahto, a 35-year-old managing editor who works in health care information technology, said the agreement is the latest in a long string of times Obama has disappointed him, and vowed it would be the last.

Special section: America's debt battle
Twitter explodes (mostly angrily) over debt deal
Debt deal inspires global stock markets

"I'm actively opposed to this president now. That also goes for his party since they've been silent through the whole ordeal," said Mahto, who thinks the debt deal will lead to an Obama defeat in 2012.

But there was also sympathy for the political leaders who worked out the pact.

Donald Price, a grocery store worker from Oxon Hill, Md., said he prays for the two sides in Congress to work together.

"I think they're just doing the best they can do," Price said. "We don't know what they face every day."

The agreement would cut at least $2.4 trillion from federal spending over a decade, but allowed the country to avoid a first-ever debt default and extended the Treasury's authority to borrow beyond the 2012 elections.

Even the outline of the agreement, much less the details, left those without strong feelings confused and frustrated.

Brett Piper, 34, and Matthew Crosby, 30, radiology residents visiting Silver Spring, Md., from Indianapolis for a conference felt that they have probably been paying more attention to the debate than most, but were still unsure how much they could really understand.

"It's hard to know what to trust," said Piper, a Republican. "It's a political game, and in this game, everyone looks bad."

Crosby agreed.

"It just makes me mad," he said. "I'm innately interested, but I just get frustrated."

Relief that the deal was struck came through but so did some skepticism.



� 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Source: http://feeds.cbsnews.com/~r/CBSNewsMain/~3/GFlzoBeNYuE/main20086195.shtml

men\\\'s health forum men\\\'s health magazine subscription healthy foundations health shoulder massage

Deal fuels global stock markets

(AP)�

SINGAPORE - World stock markets jumped Monday after President Obama announced a last-minute agreement to raise the government's debt limit and avoid a default.

Republican and Democratic leaders Sunday hashed out the details of a deal that would cut more than $2 trillion of federal spending over the next decade, and votes were expected in both houses of Congress as early as Monday.

President Obama: Deal reached on debt crisis
Boehner trumpets GOP influence in debt debate
Special section: America's debt battle

Early in Europe, the FTSE 100 index of leading British shares rose 1 percent to 5,872.91 and the CAC-40 in France was 0.6 percent higher at 3,693.48. Germany's DAX gained 0.9 percent to 7,222.27.

U.S. stocks looked set to rise strongly. Dow Jones industrial futures were up 1.2 percent at 12,227 and broader Standard & Poor's 500 futures climbed 1.1 percent to 1,302.80.

Japan's Nikkei 225 stock average closed up 1.3 percent at 9,965.01 and South Korea's Kospi gained 1.8 percent to 2,172.31.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng added 1 percent to 22,663.37 and China's Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.1 percent to 2,703.78.

Elsewhere, Australia's benchmark stock index gained 1.7 percent to 4,497.80 and New Zealand's rose 0.5 percent. India, Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines also climbed.

Markets fell last week on concern a deadlock over the debt limit would lead to the country's first debt default. Both the Dow and the S&P 500 lost about 4 percent as investors grew more anxious about the prospects for a deal.

The Treasury Department had said it would run out of money to pay the government's obligations Tuesday unless the debt limit was raised.

"It's a relief rally," said Lorraine Tan, an equities analyst with Standard and Poor's in Singapore. "First and foremost, there's not going to be a default. It takes the worst case scenario off the table"

Gold, which tends to rise when investors aren't confident about other investments, rose 2 percent last week. On Monday, it was down $13.40, or 0.8 percent, at $1,614.90.

The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note, which moves opposite from its price, rose to 2.83 percent late Sunday from 2.80 percent Friday. The rise in Treasury yields is a sign that investors are less worried. Treasury bonds have long been considered the world's safest investment.

Some analysts still expect credit rating agencies to cut the U.S.'s AAA debt rating despite Sunday's pledge to rein in spending.

"The only question is whether the rating agencies pull the trigger this week or wait a little longer," said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics. "The bigger picture is that the long-term fiscal position of the U.S. remains perilous."

The stock rally will likely be tempered by concern about slowing U.S. economic growth. The U.S. said Friday that its economy grew at an annual rate of only 1.3 percent in the second quarter.

"There will be a limitation to the uptick because U.S. GDP numbers were exceptionally disappointing," Tan said. "There are still worries about a double-dip recession."

Investors will also be eyeing the latest data about U.S. manufacturing, auto sales and unemployment this week.

The dollar rose to 77.48 yen in Asia from 76.72 yen late Friday in New York. The euro fell to $1.4394 from $1.4403.

Benchmark oil for September delivery was up $1.72 to $97.42 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Crude dropped $1.74 to settle at $95.70 on Friday.

In London, Brent crude was up $2.80 at $119.54 per barrel on the ICE Futures exchange.

Source: http://feeds.cbsnews.com/~r/CBSNewsMain/~3/noOTOizc-gI/main20086192.shtml

health care health master health aids health pro wrist watch

The Fear of ACO Commitment: It's All in the Details

By Haydn Bush July 27, 2011

Everyone loves the concept of accountable care, but will the fine print of CMS's ACO program attract enough participants?

One of the more surprising moments during last week's Health Forum-AHA Leadership Summit came when attendees were polled as to whether their hospitals would be participating in the CMS Accountable Care Organization program when it launches at the start of next year. The reaction since the proposed ACO regulations were released in April has been decidedly mixed, with providers concerned about two major problems; the difficulty of meeting the program's quality standards, and the prospect that the resulting financial incentives wouldn't be enough to justify the risk of missing out on them.

Since April, in conversations I've had with hospital executives and thought leaders, almost everyone I've spoken to embraces the broader concept of accountable care, but I've been hard-pressed to find anyone who's ready to join the CMS pilot as it currently stands. For instance, when I interviewed leaders at Chicago-based Advocate Health Care, they spoke highly of an ACO pilot they're entering into with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, but said they have not yet decided whether to participate in the federal program.

Back at the Summit, though, 45.5 percent of respondents to the poll ? to be sure, an instant, unscientific poll conducted via mobile applications ? said their hospitals would definitely or probably participate in the program when it starts in a little over five months. That suggests to me that there is a high level of interest from hospitals in the ACO concept, even as part of the federal effort, but hospitals and other providers simply want a program they feel ensures them of receiving fair value from before they sign on.

A little while after I saw the results of the poll, I sat in on an ACO-themed session that featured several CEOs of leading hospital systems, including Nancy Schlichting, CEO of Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, and Chris Van Gorder, CEO of Scripps Health in San Diego. Henry Ford has been developing an ACO with its physicians since last year, while Scripps recently formed an integrated delivery network with North American Medical Management that includes many of the same principles as an ACO. But to date, neither system has decided to join the CMS initiative.

"It's too much stick, not enough carrot," Van Gorder said. "It's pretty much a non-starter for us."

Schlichting, meanwhile, said the program needed to create more flexibility in both the structure of participating ACOs and the design of incentive payments.

Van Gorder did have some positive things to say about the Pioneer ACO model ? a sort of advanced program for early adopters of accountable care that CMS proposed in May after the negative reaction to the proposed regulations. For instance, Van Gorder noted, the Pioneer program allows for the prospective attribution of patients, which means participating ACOs would be aware of patients who are assigned to them. The proposal for the regular ACO program includes only retrospective attribution, which means ACOs would not know in advance which Medicare patients were assigned to them.

"The dialogue around the Pioneer model has been much more constructive," Van Gorder said.

Still, with five months to go until the CMS ACO program starts in earnest, it's difficult to find a hospital CEO, even from the most leading-edge organizations, who will commit to the federal program. But if you ask a roomful of hospital leaders if they think their organization will participate in theory, you'll get plenty of affirmative answers. �That suggests that CMS is on the right general track with the broad outlines of its initiative, but needs to pay much closer attention to providers' concerns about the nitty-gritty details if it hopes to receive actual commitments this summer and fall.

The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the policy of Health Forum Inc. or the American Hospital Association.

in general. All comments will be reviewed by a moderator before being posted.

Please note: Your browser cookies must be enabled to leave comments and remember your login information. If you are having trouble posting a comment please enable your browser cookies or email us your comment at hhndaily@healthforum.com.

Source: http://www.hhnmag.com/hhnmag/HHNDaily/HHNDailyDisplay.dhtml?id=874000506

health hula hoop healthy white health matters healthrider